|
KMID : 1134820120410030302
|
|
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
2012 Volume.41 No. 3 p.302 ~ p.309
|
|
|
Antioxidant Compounds and Antioxidant Activities of Different Varieties of Foxtail Millet and Proso Millet according to Cultivation Time
|
|
Woo Koan-Sik
Lee Jae-Saeng
Ko Jee-Yeon
Song Seok-Bo
Seo Hye-In
Seo Myung-Chul
Oh Byeong-Geun
Kwak Do-Yeon
Nam Min-Hee
Oh In-Seok
Jeong Heon-Sang
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Effects of cultivation time on the antioxidant contents and activities of foxtail millet and proso millet were determined. The cultivation times were early-season (ES), normal-season (NS), and late-season (LS), and the cultivated varieties were Hwanggeum-cho (HGC), Cheongcha-cho (CCC), Samdamae (SDM), Gyeongkwan 1 (GK 1), Gyeongkwan 2 (GK 2), Ganghae-cho (GHC), Hwanggeum-gijang (HGG), Manhongchal-gijang (MHCG), Byeoruk-gijang (BRG), Norangchal-gijang (NRG), and Whin-gijang (WG). The total polyphenol, flavonoid, tannin content, and DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities of the methanolic extracts of foxtail millet and proso millet showed significant differences according to cultivation variety and time. The highest total polyphenol content of foxtail millet was 29.33 mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g of sample in GK 1 at LS, whereas that of proso millet was 23.48 mg of GAE/g of sample in BRG at LS. The highest total flavonoid content of foxtail millet was 2.12 mg of catechin equivalent (CE)/g of sample in CCC at ES, whereas that of proso millet was 4.49 mg of CE/g of sample in BRG at LS. The highest total tannin content of foxtail millet was 14.07 mg of tannic acid equivalent (TAE)/g of sample in SDM at LS, whereas that of proso millet was 15.59 mg of TAE/g of sample in BRG at LS. The highest DPPH radical scavenging activity of foxtail millet was 7.71 mg of TE/g of sample in CCC at NS, whereas that of proso millet was 12.66 mg of TE/g of sample in BRG at LS. The highest ABTS radical scavenging activity of foxtail millet was 8.05 mg of TE/g of sample in GK 1 at LS, whereas that of proso millet was 34.46 mg of TE/g of sample in BRG at LS. Generally, HGC, GK 1, and GHC had more beneficial effects at LS than ES or NS, whereas CCC, SDM, and GK 2 had more beneficial effects at NS than ES or LS, and proso millet had more beneficial effects at LS than ES or NS.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
foxtail millet (Setaria italica Beauvios), proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.), cultivation time, antioxidant compound, antioxidant activity
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|